Group Report

Back Home Up Next


Summary:
1. General information
2. The Participants
3. Involved subjects
4. The objectives
5. Overview of the programme
6. Findings
7. Conclusions
8. Evaluation of the visit
9. Acknowledgements
 
 
1. General information
Date of visit: 6–10 October 2008
Group size: 13 participants, 5 staff members
Group No: 440
Title: Cultural diversity is part of our common history
Theme: 33. Strengthening intercultural education and its contribution to social integration (European Year 2008)
City, country: Procida, Italy
Type of visit: Lifelong Learning Programme Study Visit
Hosts: Mrs. Eugenia Tesoro and Mr. Gianni Altavilla on behalf of NEAC - Network of European Active Citizens
Group reporter:  Adam Kubera (Poland)

  TOP

2. The Participants
Bernard Dupont, Ministère de l'Education, Brussels, Belgium
Position: Prefect Coordinator of the Province of Luxembourg
 
Antoniya Smokova, Paideia Foundation, Sofia, Bulgaria
Position: Project Coordinator at Paideia Foundation

 
Arcangelo Di Battista, Collège "Louis Armand", Moulins-lès-metz, France
Position: Deputy Headmaster
 
Alain Flouret, Lycée "Etienne Bezout", Nemours, France
Position: Headmaster
 
Mello Kekia, Regional Department of Education, Thessaloniki Greece
Position: Primary Education School Inspector / Advisor
 
Henk Andeweg, De Danne Breukelen, The Netherlands
Position: Practical educator and city councilor (coordinator for the European Social Fund)

 
Robert Roks, Stichting LMC Voortgezet Onderwijs, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Position: Extra-education Care Manager; Managing Director of the Centre of Expertise for the Secondary Education System
 
Adam Kubera, Szkola Podstawowa nr 113, Lodz, Poland
Position: English teacher and Comenius coordinator
 
Sofia Santos, Regional Archive of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal
Position: Coordinator for contacts with secondary schools
 
Malin Heimer, Bergsåkers skola, Sundsvall, Sweden
Position: Coach for the project of ‘Education and Working Life’ at The Children’s Services and Education Committee
 
Peter Callaway, Gilthill Primary School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Position: Headteacher
 
Robert Carlyle, Mornington Primary School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Position: Headteacher
 
Brian Summers, Horsendale Primary School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Position: Headteacher
 

  TOP

3. Involved subjects
Schools, Universities, NEAC Comenius Network, Governmental Institutions, Companies, Associations.
Representatives: head teachers, educational experts, teachers, teacher trainers

  TOP

4. The objectives
4.1 Compatibility with Education and Training 2010 objectives

2.3. Supporting active citizenship, equal opportunities and social cohesion
3.5. Strengthening the European co-operation
 

4.2 Detailed objectives of the visit

1. Promoting the exchange of good practices within the Lifelong Learning Programme with particular emphasis on projects exploring the issue of the European citizenship. Forming new partnerships and facilitating the creation of new projects within the Lifelong Learning Programme
2. Initiating and/or strengthening the cooperation between local and regional institutions in the field of education, culture, politics and the mass media, aimed to facilitate the creation and successful execution of educational projects.
3. Emphasizing the importance of strengthening the integration of schools with external institutions as an example of transnational cooperation
4. Indicating the important role of the “alimentary culture” as an anthropological paradigm of society facilitating the educational research into national and regional cultures of the European countries, useful in the development of the common European identity
5. Promoting the intercultural dialogue on European cooperation, with special emphasis on the issues of social integration in culturally diverse environments
 

4.3 Working methods

1. Visits to educational and cultural institutions, meetings and interviews with students, teachers, heads of schools and educational and cultural experts
2. Group and individual work during seminars, roundtables, visits, meetings and thematic workshops
3. Carrying out observation activities and experience analysis by study visit participants, comparing approaches, exchanging information, drawing conclusions, evaluating experiences, generating reports
 

  TOP

5. Overview of the programme
October 6, Monday
1. Arrival and registration of Participants
2. Opening Session
Welcome speeches by:
Gerardo Lubrano Lavadera, Mayor of Procida
Enrico Scotto di Carlo, Municipality of Procida, Councillor for Culture and NEAC President
Eugenia Tesoro, NEAC General Director
Lectures:
- "Cultural diversity is part of our common history" by Panayiotis Angelides, Associate Professor of Education, Head Department of Education - University of Nicosia, Cyprus
- "The Italian education system" by Antonella Turchi, Eurydice Italian Unit Co-ordinator
- "Using the media to support intercultural education" by Cáit Curran, Editor of Magazine Organic Matters, Newtownforbes, Ireland
- "Twenty years of the Erasmus Programme: the origin, preparatory years (1963-1986) and foundation in the memories of the Scholar who first conceived of it" by Sofia Corradi, Ordinary Professor of Lifelong Learning - "Roma Tre" State University, Italy
3. Welcome Dinner

October 7, Tuesday
1. Participants self-presentations follow-up discussion
2. Follow-up discussion
3. Visit to "A. Capraro", Lower Secondary School
Welcome speech by: Maria Saletta Longobardo, Headmistress
4. Pizza Workshop and Feast "How to cook the original Neapolitan Pizza"
5. Lunch
6. Workshop
- "The Lifelong Learning Programme opportunities" by Stefanie Møller, NEAC Denmark Deputy President
7. Follow-up discussion
8. Dinner

October 8, Wednesday
1. Visit to "Giovanni da Procida" Secondary School & Navy Museum
Welcome speech by: Maurizio Piscitelli, Headmaster
2. Lunch
3. Thematic workshop on the issue of European integration
Conductor: Finbarr O'Regan, NEAC Ireland Deputy President
4. Dinner

October 9, Thursday
1. Visit to "Vittorio Scialoja" Primary School
Welcome speech by: Lora Verrusio Grippa Scafati, Headmistress
2. Lunch
3. Workshop. "Draft of Project: why not?"
Conductors: Stefanie Møller and Finbarr O'Regan
4. Final session on Group Report
5. Evaluation of the program
6. Farewell dinner including Neapolitan traditional songs

October 10, Friday
Departure of Participants

  TOP

6. Findings

The visit was an excellent opportunity for the participants to share knowledge and exchange experiences regarding a variety of issues in the area of education and culture. The highest attention was given to exploring the theme-related issues, namely the structure and operation of education systems in Europe, the implications of the Lifelong Learning Programme for the participants and their institutions (involvement in former and current projects, drafting future partnerships) and, eventually, the approaches to the problem of multicultural diversity in the participant countries. The exploration of the three aspects has extended the participants’ knowledge of these issues as well as constituting a platform for exchanging ideas and experiences.

6a. Acquaintance with the structure and operation of education systems in Italy (the host country) and the participant countries

The visits to three local schools of primary and secondary education followed by lectures and discussions with head teachers, teachers and educational experts from Procida (and especially the lecture on the Italian education system given by Ms Antonella Turchi, Eurydice Italian Unit Co-ordinator) provided the participants with the basic insight into the structure and functioning of the education system in Italy. Since all the participants are involved in the field of primary and secondary education in their own institutions, the following brief overview will be limited to discussing these two stages.

- The structure of the Italian education system
The compulsory education begins at the age of 6 and lasts until the age of 14 (with the school-leaving age of 15). It can be preceded by 3 years of optional pre-school nursery training. Elementary education covers five years of Scuola Elementare and leads to the Diploma di Licenza della Scuola Elementare. Secondary education lasts for eight years, divided into three years of compulsory lower secondary school (Scuola Media Inferiore) and five years of upper secondary education. The upper secondary courses consist of classical, scientific, artistic, technical, vocational and teacher training options. Classical secondary school (Liceo Classico) lasts for five years, with emphasis on the Humanities, but with scientific subjects in the second cycle. Scientific secondary school (Liceo Scientifico) also lasts for five years, but provides more specialized preparation in scientific subjects. The Liceo Linguistico focuses on the study of foreign languages together with the corresponding literature and civilization. The technical upper secondary programmes are offered by the Istituti Tecnici and last for five years. Vocational secondary education is provided by the Istituto Professionale, Liceo Artistico, and Istituto di Arte. All these programmes used to lead to different types of Diploma di Maturità (Maturità Classica, Scientifica, Linguistica, Artistica, Magistrale, Tecnica, etc). A Maturità was the minimum admission requirement to university studies, as well as to most programmes at non-university institutions of higher education. Since 1998-1999 the school leaving qualification is the ‘Diploma di Esame di Stato conclusivo del corso di…’ equivalent to the former Maturità. More detailed information on the Italian education system, as well as the education systems of other E.U. countries can be found in the Eurydice database, available at
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice

- Tendencies for the unification of the compulsory education age levels in the E.U.
The series of the participants’ self-presentations given on the second day of the visit, including the information on the main characteristics of the education systems in their countries, led to a group discussion on the similarities and differences between education systems across the E.U as well as the implications of different approaches on the effectiveness of education in the countries involved. The comparison of compulsory education age levels in the countries involved showed the age of 6 as the starting age in the majority of E.U. countries (except the United Kingdom and the Netherlands where obligatory education starts at the age of 5 as well as Denmark and Bulgaria – where the starting age is 7) and lasts until the ages of 15/16 or 17 n the case of the Netherlands. The division of the education system is usually into pre-primary (or nursery) education, which is non-compulsory, the compulsory stages of lower primary education (3-4 years) followed by the upper primary school (2-4 years) as well as the lower secondary (2-4 years) education. The upper secondary education is optional in most of our countries although it is taken by the majority of students wishing to enter universities and colleges of higher education. The participants from Poland and Bulgaria have also presented the basic changed resulting from the educational reforms in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in late 1990s, which have resulted in remodelling their national systems of educations in accordance with current E.U. standards.

- Selected advantages and drawbacks of the education systems in the participant countries discussed during the visit
As well as introducing the structure of the education systems in their countries, the participants have discussed the main advantages as well as the most serious problems facing these systems. The head teachers of three primary schools from Nottingham, UK indicated the benefits of adequate funding of British schools, which, among other things, allows the provision of up-to-date resources for the pupils and the staff. Similar attitudes were expressed by the representatives of schools from Denmark, Sweden and Holland. On the contrary, the Bulgarian representative pointed out the problem of inadequate funding spent on education in her country and the lack of any effective reformatory actions on the part of the Ministry of Science and Education. The poverty-level salaries for teachers and educational staff and the unstable working conditions offered lead to the general dissatisfaction with the operation of the education system in Bulgaria and result in taking radical measures such as national protests and strikes (with last year’s six-week long teacher strike as the most serious example of such actions). Another problem mentioned by Ms Antonia Smokova was the high percentage of drop-out students at the level of secondary education. The problem of insufficient earnings in the public education sector (when compared to the increasing costs of living) and insufficient financial support of schools in Poland was also indicated by the author of this report. Both Ms Smokova and Mr Kubera, however, notice the increasing application of ICT resources in Bulgarian and Polish schools, as well as the growing emphasis on the effectiveness of teaching English and other foreign languages. In Poland, for instance, teaching English has been obligatory for pupils aged 7-9 since 2007.

- Observations and reflections from visits to schools in Procida
The participants of the study visit had an opportunity to visit three schools situated in the island of Procida. We began with a tour of A. Capraro Scuola Media (Lower Secondary School) where we were welcomed by the headmistress Maria Saletta Longobardo. The school was also the main venue for seminars and workshops held by the participants of this study visit. We all noticed a variety of decorations in the corridors and inside the classrooms, which make the school visually attractive for the pupils, staff and parents alike. The carvings representing the Stations of the Cross made us aware of both the important role of teaching artistic subjects in the school as well as the attention given to preserving the national cultural and religious identity.
The school teaches pupils aged 11-14. However, it participates in the PROGETTI DI CONTINUITA program, which means the last grade of the school works with the first grade of a high school. Students of the last grade are orientated by the school for the choice of the most suitable high school. Part of this programme involves observatory visits to secondary schools. There is a special emphasis on the music education in the institution, the result of which is a successful music program carried out by the institution. The visitors of our group were impressed by the size of the local orchestra (about 60 students) who both participate in as well as organize national and international music competitions. Another priority integrated in the school curriculum is the teaching of English as a foreign language. We have seen well-equipped language laboratories, using up-to-date ICT equipment as well as modern teaching resources. The French language is another foreign language taught in the school. We expressed our admiration for the strong support from the parents, whose active involvement in the school life plays an enormous role for the effective organization of school events and local trips. The best example was the coffee break we were invited to on the roof terrace and the treat of regional delicacies of Procida, all prepared and served by a group of parents.
Significant parental support could also be noticed during our visit to "Vittorio Scialoja" Scuola Elementare (primary school), both in preparing an outdoor show of dance and music given by the pupils to welcome the participants as well as in arranging a treat for the participants of the study visit. The author of this report had already been to the same school a year before and was amazed by the extent of the parents’ assistance in preparing a feast made of regional foods from Procida and Naples region. The introduction by the headmistress, Mrs Lora Verrusio Grippa Scafati was followed by an amazingly lively, colourful and spontaneous pupil’s show, which gave us an impression of the warm and welcoming atmosphere in the school and the friendly relations among, and between the pupils, teachers and the parents. While sightseeing the school we could admire eye-catching paintings on the walls showing the images of Procida (created by pupils under a guidance of a local painting artist) as well as displays of the pupils’ art projects, all of which seem to constitute a big contribution to creating a favourable atmosphere for learning as well as relaxing during break time.
The school occupies two buildings located in different parts of the island. It has pupils aged 3 to 5 in the preschool and ages 6 to 11 on the primary school. English language education starts at the age 6. There is also a pottery lab and a music lab used by pupils aged 8 to 11. The main events of the school are Christmas festival, the Carnival parade and the sporting day. There is a lunch scheme in the school, operating from Monday to Thursday. Having visited several of the schools’ classrooms and laboratories (English, ICT) we were invited to attend a therapeutic workshop for four year olds in the “Laboratory for Psycho-Motor training”, aimed at 3-7 year-old children with special needs. The children participated willingly in the session, following the trainer’s instructions aimed to facilitate the children’s spatial perception and, among other things, build up their confidence. We were also invited to see the school’s elaborate website, presenting the different projects they have been involved in (including the nutrition-related Comenius partnership coordinated by the author of this report). Many of the projects are carried out with a strong financial and organizational support of the local institutions (in the field of ecology, health service, fire emergency, and the like), which we found very important for effective execution of such projects. One of the projects involving the fifth-grade pupils is a snorkeling project carried out with the assistance of diving experts. The school also collaborates with biologic farms in the Naples area
We also paid a visit "Giovanni da Procida" Istituto Comprensivo (secondary school) and the Navy Museum located on the school premises. The absence of Mr Maurizio Piscitelli, the school headmaster, who had to attend a meeting with the Ministry of Education in Rome, resulted in some alterations to the programme of the school tour. Having visited part of the school, we were invited to see a nautical museum located on the school premises, where we became acquainted with the history and tradition of the nautical profession in Procida, crucial for the development of the island. As to the school, it is divided into four branches: a nautical school, a scientific lyceum, a psycho-pedagogical lyceum and a linguistic lyceum. There is a five-year education process (ages 14-19). Students learn English as an obligatory subject as well as, optionally, French or German. In the linguistic lyceum Spanish is taught as the third obligatory foreign language.
The general feeling our group had following the school visits was very positive. We were impressed by the outstanding competence and high motivation of the teaching staff, the application of innovative, project-based methodologies in teaching various subjects, the use of up-to-date resources in the education process, the overall visual attractiveness and the effective spatial organization of the schools, the support of parents and outside institutions and, last but definitely not least, by a warm welcome, a great hospitality and openness of all our hosts, including the school management, teachers, pupils and their parents respectively.

6b. Exploring the subject of cultural diversity in the countries represented

- The multicultural image of Cyprus presented by Mr Panayiotis Angelides
The theme of cultural diversity and ways of handling the issue was discussed each day during the visit. It was introduced in a lecture entitled "Cultural diversity is part of our common history" given by Panayiotis Angelides, Associate Professor of Education from the University of Nicosia, Cyprus, who provided us with a deep insight in the historical background of multiculturalism in Cyprus, inhabited by people of several nationalities. Although the population is dominated by two opposing communities, the Greek Cypriot community and the Turkish Cypriot group, there are also the Maronite, Armenian and Latin inhabitants who have lived in Cyprus for centuries, as well as Gypsy and Anglican minorities. Recent years have also seen the immigration from Eastern Europe, the Subcontinent and South-East Asia, which made the multicultural situation even more complex. Although efforts have been made to facilitate integration between the different national and religious minorities, the reality is that the cultural diversity is not always acknowledged or respected in Cyprus. However, there are numerous initiatives aimed to improve the effectiveness of the integration process, including the representation of minority groups in the parliament and endowing them with voting rights in the matters related to their communities, the revision of history and civics textbooks, as well as introducing the education in the languages of the minority groups in schools. The Ministry of Education and Culture is promoting the implementation of educational measures and policies that will facilitate the smooth integration of groups from different cultural identities in a creative environment, regardless of background. The Department of Primary Education makes provisions so that bilingual pupils are distributed evenly in the various districts, schools and even classrooms, so that teachers can support their linguistic and cultural needs more effectively.

- The image of multiculturalism, approaches to the issue and challenges presented by the participants of the study visit
The lecture gave rise to a group discussion on the issue of cultural diversity in the participant countries. The Bulgarian representative complained about the inadequate level of multi-cultural integration in her country, pointing out an example of a numerous Gypsy community who shows very little motivation to integrate with the Bulgarian majority despite the governmental measures aimed to facilitate integration. Similar tendencies related to the Gypsy population can be observed in Poland, the best example of which is the author’s institution (a primary school in Lodz) where individual Romany pupils (especially male students) hardly ever integrate with other pupils, showing frequently the attitudes of ignorance, laziness and aggressive behaviour. Integration problems were also mentioned by Sofia Santos, representative of Madeira (Portugal) who said the schools in Madeira are not always effective at integrating the students from African countries (former Portuguese colonies) as well as, recently, from Eastern Europe. She also mentioned the application of integration programs based on learning the Portuguese language as well as involvement in social services, arts and dance. On the contrary, a positive opinion regarding cultural integration was expressed by Peter Callaway, Robert Carlyle, and Brian Summers, the headmasters of three primary schools from Nottingham linked within the so-called “Family of Schools”. They were satisfied with the level of integration between pupils of different ethnic and religious minorities in their schools (including people from India, Pakistan, Africa and Eastern Europe), indicating the existence of mutual understanding and tolerance among the student community. The ethnic diversity is used by their institutions as a resource to carry out cross-cultural study in the schools.
Finbarr O'Regan, NEAC Ireland Deputy President, and Cáit Curran, Editor of ‘Organic Matters’ Magazine from Ireland have indicated a fast increase in the number of immigrants since the year 2000, which has resulted in a growing problem of the multicultural integration in their area. Once considered as mostly homogeneous, Ireland has seen several waves of immigration in the last eight years, predominantly from Brazil, Africa, Eastern and Central Europe (Poland, Czech Republic, Romania) followed by Russian and Spanish immigration, with the simultaneous decrease in the immigration from the former Eastern Block. The Irish representatives have also presented several interesting ideas on the ways of successful integration for culturally diverse communities. One of them was the idea of carrying out organic farming projects, presented by Ms Curran. The encouragement of using the traditional farming methods in the cultivation of fruit and vegetables turned out a very effective way of involving the majority of the local community in the project activities, resulting, among other things, in the decrease in the local crime rate. At the same time it fulfilled an important educational function, contributing to the revival of the local farming traditions. The Dutch representatives, Robert Roks and Henk Andeweg have given a brief overview of the multicultural background of the Netherlands (including strong communities from Spain, Germany, France, England, India, North America, Indonesia, North and South Africa, and Eastern Europe), indicating the successful integration of some nations (such as Spanish) and less successful of others (Morocco). Dutch schools, however, make intense efforts to facilitate cultural integration through, among other things, introducing programs to promote tolerance and understanding of other cultures. One specific example of such integrative activities is having meals together by all pupils in a given school (not only lunch, but also breakfast and afternoon meals). Mr Roks emphasized his support of cultural integration and giving equal educational opportunities for all pupils within the system. It is extremely important for the area of Rotterdam where, as he said, 106 different nationalities are registered.
Multicultural diversity can also be noticed in the French-speaking part of Belgium, represented by Bernard Dupont. The main ethnic groups include communities from France, Luxembourg, and Portugal, who collaborate with one another in carrying out school projects as well as organizing student exchanges with schools in Germany and France. The Greek representative, Ms Mello Kekia, Primary Education School Inspector and Advisor, has presented Greece as a multicultural country, where actions are taken to help the foreign pupils integrate with the Greek community through enabling them to participate in multicultural classes aimed at providing linguistic support in learning the Greek language. Ms Malin Heimer from Sweden, in turn, pointed out that the problems with multicultural diversity in her country vary depending on the structure of population in a particular area. As a matter of fact, the integration is especially difficult for the communities from Islamic countries (due to ideological, cultural and linguistic barriers) and immigrants from Easter Europe (mainly due to problems learning the Swedish language). Regardless of the extent of cultural integration, the Swedish system enables the implementation of various tools targeted at facilitating integration for all foreign immigrants.
Eventually, the representatives of France, Mr Arcangelo Di Battista and Mr Alan Flouret, have approached the group to the “French example” of multiculturalism, where diversity is evident everywhere and at all times. At the same time they made the group aware that the cultural differences in the ways of life are quite attached to the different local areas. They commented on the world-famous incidents of conflicts between the Arabic and African immigrants and the French authorities in the suburban districts of Paris, drawing attention to the fact, however, that the core of the problem lies in mainly the disadvantageous economic situation of these cultural groups and their ideological claims contradictory to the democratic principles of France rather than a deep ethnic or religious conflict, as it is frequently assumed. Nevertheless they notice the growing intensity of racism and discrimination toward the immigrant populations (especially black and catholic), including even those communities that have inhabited France for generations. Serious social tensions also arise around the several-million Muslim community, and they result from negative reactions of the European part of French society towards the terrorist attacks carried out by fundamentalists as well as from the Muslim community criticism of the measure banning to wear head scarves in public schools, introduced by the French Education Minister. As the French participants of the study visit point out, however, the current policies of the French government are showing tendencies toward a better and more effective multicultural integration among French society.
Eventually, we were presented to a very interesting way of promoting multicultural diversity locally, in the island of Procida, where the local elementary school initiated integration-related activities by inviting pupils, parents and teachers – representatives of different cultures present on the island, to take part in a big Christmas festival which involved the preparation, display and eating together their national and regional foods, getting dressed in their traditional clothes, singing Christmas songs from different parts of the world as well as presenting Christmas-related traditions to the whole group. This type of activities proved an excellent way of introducing people of different cultures to one another who may have coexisted for a long time without knowing much of the other communities.

- The group discussion on cultural diversity following the lecture by Finnbarr O’Regan and the solutions suggested
The lecture entitled “Strengthening Intercultural Education and Its Contribution to Social Integration” given by Finnbarr O’Regan showed different perspectives of the issue of multicultural diversity, as well as putting forward some general ideas of how to improve the existence of different ethnic and religious communities in Europe focusing on the field of school education. The session was concluded with an inspiring discussion on the differences between ‘integration’ and ‘inclusion’ and the ways of coping with both issues in our own situations. After exchanging different views we realised there is no proper definition for integration, diversity or interculturality as the terms can only be defined according to certain local conditions in a given area or institution. This stems from the fact that there are still areas where the existence of different cultures is considered as a nuisance or threat by the majority of the local community while in other places multiculturalism is viewed as a great opportunity for promoting shared human values across Europe. There was, however, a general agreement that the effectiveness of any actions is largely dependent on our own self-awareness in terms of our own identity, values, national and cultural background. We shared the view that it is necessary to have enough confidence in your own beliefs first (which we, as teachers, ought to instill in our students in the education process). Only then are we able to truly open to diversity. An important role of the participants of this visit was underlined. A few-day meeting of people of different nationalities and diverse backgrounds made us more aware of the meaning of ‘integration’ which, as we all decided, must start ‘from the bottom of your heart’. Openness to other man and a broad-minded attitude should be the first step toward understanding and learning true tolerance and respect for others.
Adopting a proper attitude to diversity does not only concern multicultural societies. As a matter of fact, diversity can be observed in the great majority of schools in all countries and it does not exclusively apply to ‘foreigners’ or ‘immigrants’. It is especially important in more homogeneous societies (such as Poland, for instance) where there is an observable diversity of views and beliefs among students and teachers of a given school, often correlating with different political or religious convictions, varied economic situation, abilities and competence. The different needs are a frequent reason for antagonism and conflicts among communities, which could be reduced in the atmosphere of higher tolerance and understanding. It seems obvious that building a common European citizenship – one of key objectives for the future of the European Union, is not possible without crossing any barriers between people of one nation. Moreover, the group also noticed the fact that multiculturalism is a fast-growing phenomenon and, some countries (Poland, for instance), which have traditionally been considered as homogenous, are now experiencing changes in the structure of population as a result of job immigration from, and to Poland. Therefore more attention need to be given to the problems being discussed.
A question also arouse whether interculturality provides equal opportunities for all, and the answer expressed by nearly all participants was negative. The solutions depend on the extent of successful multicultural integration in a given country, area, or institution. In the first place, as the group underlined, was the above-mentioned necessity to adopt the positive and friendly attitude toward another human regardless of their national, racial, religious, political or economic background. However clichéd it may sound, it is the primary requirement for any improvement in the field of human relations. Diversity ought to be defined at a local rather than national level. Closely linked to this (as it is people who create law) is creating favourable conditions by political decision-makers aimed at facilitating multicultural integration, including both legislative and executive actions. Thirdly, it is the proper execution of integration-related laws by institutions (schools, universities) ensuring the conditions of equality for everyone. At this stage actions ought to be targeted both at pupils (activities carried out during school-time as well as out of school) and their parents, respectively (educational campaigns aimed to raise the awareness of social rights as well as duties of all citizens) with the ultimate aim of breaking any prejudice toward other cultures, rooted in people’s minds and preventing any effective intercultural dialogue. One of crucial actions here is raising people’s awareness of tolerance and respect of otherness to such an extent that no support (whether active or passive support, which can be of equally damaging effect), is shown by the majority group toward any prejudicial actions originated among the group and directed against minority groups.
The following ideas present selected solutions that may be applied to enhance successful integration in multicultural schools
• implementing educational campaigns promoting tolerance and respect of other cultures, addressed both to majority- as well as minority groups in schools, including pupils and their parents
• more emphasis on teaching the language and culture of the minority groups in schools
• more emphasis on teaching and preserving national culture and traditions in society ethnic majority groups to build up confidence in one’s own values first, necessary to eliminate bias and prejudice toward other values
• increasing the effectiveness of teaching the language and culture of the native country groups to minority groups in schools
• holding schools events promoting the culture and traditions of different ethnic communities
• holding local events addressed to the whole community including all cultures represented with the aim of making the immigrant or other minority groups more active and useful for the community
• carrying out educational, cultural and sporting programmes addressed at the most gifted minority pupils
• launching food programmes by school canteens, including meals from different cultures in the school menu

6c. The relevance of the visit to the Lifelong Learning Programme initiatives

The presentations from the study visit participants given during the working sessions showed both the involvement of their institutions in the projects of the Lifelong Learning Programme as well as their personal experiences in this area. Some institutions have already had direct experience in carrying out LLP projects, namely the schools from Denmark, France (Nemours), Holland (Rotterdam), Ireland, Poland and Sweden. Three of these schools (from France, Poland, and Sweden) are currently involved in a Comenius partnership of schools. The school from Belgium has participated in an international student exchange programme, while the Bulgarian representative has taken part in the Erasmus programme as a student. The Greek representative, in turn, maintains regular contacts with a group of 18 primary schools in Central Macedonia, some of which have either participated or are interested in the future involvement in LLP. The representative of Portugal, on the other hand, is in charge of contacts with Madeiran secondary schools, some of which are keen to participate in Comenius partnerships. The three schools from Nottingham and the French school from the Metz region have expressed their interest in LLP pointing out they would like to engage in a project that covers their schools’ statutory priorities.
They series of presentations was followed by a thematic workshop on Lifelong Learning by Stephanie Møller, the NEAC Denmark deputy President, providing the group with numerous details of the programme, ways of participating, formal requirements, type of activities, shared products, evaluation, and the like. Afterwards the group discussed the implications of a joint program under the LLL program. The participants who have not taken part in LLP projects were interested in the formal procedure of starting a project. The position and funding of the role of coordinator were addressed, with the conclusion that different national agencies have different priorities in assigning extra funds to support coordinating schools. Another discussion was devoted to the differences in operation of the various National Agencies and the conditions under which new projects could lead to the creation or development of a European curriculum by researching the content behind the different curricula subjects. An example was given by Mr Alain Flouret who put forward a question on the differences in understanding the content of certain school subjects (Maths or History, for instance) by the curricula in different European countries.

- Presenting good practices of the Lifelong Learning Programme and other E.U. programmes

Title of the project/programme/
initiative/...
Name of the institution that implements it (website) Contact person (if possible), who presented the programme to the group Whom the project/programme/
initiative addresses
What features of the project/programme/
initiative make it an example of good practice

Healthy Diet through Regional Cuisines
a multilateral Comenius partnership within the Lifelong Learning Programme;

2006-2009

Aims: Arising the participants’ interest in the alimentary traditions of their countries, exploring the eating habits of their regions focusing on the aspect of healthy nutrition and, eventually, encouraging the participants to give more attention to the composition of their daily menus by enriching them with healthy food products, originating in many cases from their own regions.

Coordinator: Szkola Podstawowa nr 113 (primary school), Lodz, Poland

Project website: http://www.neac.eat-online.net/healthydiet/ang.html

Participant countries: Poland, Italy, Portugal, Bulgaria.

Adam Kubera, Lodz, Poland

curczak@o2.pl

Direct addressee: Pupils, parents, teachers, staff and the local communities of the schools involved

Indirect addressee: school children and adults interested in the theme of healthy nutrition; relevant theme-related institutions;

Correlation with all LLP objectives;extensive use of ICT (see the project website); emphasis on using English as the working language of the project; involvement of all pupils regardless of status, abilities, religion etc.; high involvement of the teaching staff, parents and associated partners; consistency in documenting, evaluating and disseminating the project activities; high impact on the school’s local community; effective cooperation between the partner schools, creating of numerous shared products 

Food to Go
a multilateral Comenius partnership within the Lifelong Learning Programme

2006-2009

Aims: Raising awareness of the importance of good diet and healthy active life

Coordinator: Harris School, Rugby, England, UK

Project website: http://www.harris-school.co.uk/ 

Participant countries: Bulgaria, France, Germany, Poland, Sweden, UK

Coordinator: Fred Rex, Rugby, UK
fjrex@yahoo.com

Project presented by: Malin Heimer, Sundsvall, Sweden
malin.heimer@skola.sundsvall.se

See above See above

Using the media to support intercultural education
on the example of ‘Organic Matters’ magazine

An ecological project carried out throughout Ireland and partner countries 

Aims: Promoting ecological farming methods and healthy nutrition in and outside the local community; involving people of all cultures, backgrounds etc in the local community in the project as a way of dealing with social problems existing in the area (e.g. rising crime rates)

Coordinator: Cáit Curran, Editor of ‘Organic Matters’ Magazine, Consultant and lecturer for Organic Horticulture, Champion of Board of the Management of Primary School; Newtownforbes, Ireland

Project website:
http://www.organicmattersmag.com/

Coordinator: Cáit Curran, Newtownforbes, Ireland
ccurran@ireland.com

Local community (with emphasis on schools’ pupils and staff) Effective implementation of ecological as well as multicultural education; involvement of the whole community; effectiveness in coping with social problems; promoting national and local traditions of agri- and horticulture in the participants, including primary and secondary schools

Apart from these practices, discussed in a more detail, the following projects, initiatives or institutions were also addressed:

- Building partnerships for future projects
The last workshop, conducted by Ms Stephanie Møller and Mr Finnbarr O’Regan, was devoted to the possibilities of starting new projects by the participants of the study visit. The theme “Draft of project: why not?” encouraged the group to engage in a brainstorming session in which we were asked to put forward our ideas, or dreams we would like to achieve through the execution of new projects. The discussion has led to taking inventory of different ideas individual members of the group had in their minds about the subject matter of potential LLP projects.
The group have presented the following ideas:

  • Carrying out a research in the way food may be helpful in changing the children’s behavior (Robert Roks, NL and Adam Kubera, PL)

  • Exploring the links between food and culture in various European countries – participants of a new Comenius project, with emphasis on implementing nutritional programmes effective in coping with violence and aggression in schools (Adam Kubera, PL)

  • Carrying out a project in which all participant schools will contribute to creating a shared product in the form of a book or film on a given theme (each school is expected to create their own chapter or film scene that would be put together In a form of a shared product) (Henk Andeweg, NL)

  • Working out a programme of an in-service headmaster training on school management strategies on the subject of dealing with all sorts of pupils, involving such aspects as the inclusion of minorities, socially impaired children, children with high intelligence etc) (Mello Kekia, GR)

  • Adopting the above-mentioned headmaster training program and extending it to involve a partner school from Nepal. Engaging in a collaboration with French schools with the goal of improving the effectiveness of French language education for English children (Peter Callaway, UK)

  • Exploring the ways of obtaining funds for carrying out programmes on cultural education. Implementing such programs in the schools of Madeira, setting up culture-related exhibitions, increasing the emphasis on cultural education in local primary and secondary schools (Sofia Santos, PT)

  • Engaging in an intercultural dialogue in French schools facilitated by the involvement of the mass media (newspaper articles), international student meetings in different countries aimed at learning other cultures (Alain Flouret, FR)

  • Arranging student and teacher mobilities between irish and Bulgarian schools on the basis of researching into specific agricultural skills common to both countries. Another objective mentioned is the benefit of English language education for the schools in Bulgaria (Antoniya Smokova, BG)

  • Starting a project on breaking down prejudices against other nations, cultures etc through creating an international website by students from European countries, discussions in chatrooms, etc (Antoniya Smokova, BG)

  • Carrying out a project on trash collection, recycling and environmental problems by students from Italy (Naples) and Bulgaria (Sofia), cities facing serious environmental problems (Antoniya Smokova, BG)

  • A project on ethnic minorities, ways of integration with the Romanian, Gypsy and Turkish communities in the schools involved, emphasis on dropout prevention in secondary schools (Antoniya Smokova, BG)

  • Supporting the programme suggested by Ms Mello Kekia of Greece. Carrying out a project on the integration of working life in the classrooms. Encouraging  entrepreneurs to cooperate with schools by visiting them and providing the pupils with hands-on practical experience (Malin Heimer, SE)

  • A project on the international issue of climate change and global warming (Rob Carlisle, UK)

  • Starting a programme allowing the international exchange of students, educational and managerial staff with the aim of increasing general awareness of the operation of education systems in different countries (Arcangelo Di Battista, FR)

  • A project on intercultural education. Creating a corpus of European cultural heroes in the field music, fine arts, cinema, architecture etc and including in the national curricula of all EU countries (Bernard Dupont)

  • Following the ideas presented by Ms Kekia and Mr Battista, carrying out a project providing the schools’ educational and managerial staff with first hand experiences of education systems in partner countries, ways of handling problems (including problems of multicultural integration in schools). 

Of the following initiatives, one suggested by Robert Roks and Adam Kubera was found interesting by representatives of 10 countries who said they would present the ideas to their to their Colleagues in their own institutions or other related institutions in their regions with the aim of creating a new Comenius partnership within LLP. The session was concluded with a summary of the discussion aimed to provide the input for the final report that will be submitted by Mr Adam Kubera

  TOP

7. Conclusions
In conclusion, all the participants were unanimous as to the great value of the visit, both in terms of expanding their knowledge and raising awareness of the issue of multicultural diversity in European societies, the problems linked to it and the solutions applied in different countries, as well as for the better understanding of the structure and functioning of education systems of Italy and the participant countries. Furthermore, the ideas for future projects within the Lifelong Learning Programme put forward by the study visit participants prove the usefulness of the visit in the aspect of forming LLP partnerships and developing intercultural collaboration between educational institutions across the European Union.
The efficient organization of the visit provided us with several opportunities to experience various aspects of the education system in Italy, allowing each individual participant to concentrate on the most relevant aspect to their profession and area of interest. The visits to schools in Procida and the participation in lectures enabled us to gain some basic insight into the organization and operation of a nursery, primary and secondary school, which in turn gave rise to making comparisons with the way different schools operate in the countries represented in the visit and to sharing the best experiences with our colleagues with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of our schools.
The thematic lectures and workshops on cultural diversity and approaches to integration of multi-cultural pupils in schools and other educational and cultural institutions have made the group more sensitive to the issue of multiculturalism, which is now growing in importance due to the large extent and high pace of immigration across European countries. Having presented the approaches applied in different countries and suggested solutions to major problems facing multicultural integration, the group members accepted the role as ‘missionaries’ for their own countries and regions. Everyone was very keen to participate in a similar meeting in two or three years’ time to discuss the current situation regarding multiculturalism in their countries as well as evaluate the effectiveness of their own initiatives and actions in the field discussed. We all agreed that Europe’s great cultural diversity represents a unique advantage that must be appreciated and protected.
The participation in a cookery workshop devoted to the traditional Neapolitan cuisine (pizza) as well as the visit to the nautical museum presented the group with examples of both cultural aspects (exploring local traditions through acquaintance with the alimentary culture) as well as geographic and professional conditions (an island, the existence of which depended on sea trade and fishing profession) influencing the formation of the local community and strengthening bonds between the local people and the newcomers from various parts of the globe.
The size of the group made it possible for all participants to contribute to the discussions, which may not have been easy for a larger group. The written information received in advance from the visit organizers was helpful for both reaching the venue of the visit (which requires air, sea and land travel to complete the journey) as well as with getting around the island and participating effectively in all activities included in the programme.
All things considered, the visit was described as extremely beneficial and enjoyable by all participants. There were two suggestions that the group made to take into consideration if such a visit were to take place again. Most of the group would have liked to have the possibility of lesson observation, which could have complemented the observations we made during the tours of the schools and interviews with teachers and pupils. We would also have appreciated the opportunity to see a cultural event regarding the theme of the visit such as the multicultural festivals held in the Procida elementary school around Christmas time. The group have also been very keen to stay in contact with the group organizers, the Network of Active European Citizens and the Italian institutions we visited, and the other participants (via email or other ways) so as to continue our shared learning experiences. This can also be extended to maintaining contact between our institutions (including the pupils, teachers and managerial staff) in order to enable the exchange of knowledge and cross-cultural education between representatives of our countries.

  TOP

8. Evaluation of the visit

According to the group evaluation, 11 out of 13 participants said they were very satisfied with the visit and the other 2 said they were satisfied, which proves the effectiveness of the visit in terms of meeting the participants’ needs and expectations. The following chart expressing the participants’ detailed assessment of the visit is another indicator of the high overall evaluation of the meeting
 

 

 

All agree

Most agree

Most disagree

All disagree

Not applicable

e.g.

The size of the group was good.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.1.         

The programme of the visit was coherent to the description in the catalogue.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.2.         

There was a balance between theoretical and practical sessions.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.3.         

The presentations and field visits complemented one another.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.4.         

The topic was presented from the perspectives of the following actors of the education and training system in the host country:

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

a

-0    government and policy makers

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

b

-1    social partners

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

c

-2    heads of institutions

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

d

-3    teachers and trainers

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

e

-4    students/trainees

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

f

-5    users of services

¨

¨

¨

¨

x

1.5.         

There was time allocated to the presentations by the participants.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.6.         

Background documentation on the theme provided before the visit helped to prepare for the visit.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.7.         

Most of the group received a programme well in advance.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.8.         

The information about transportation and accommodation provided before the visit was precise.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.9.         

The size of the group was good.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.10.         

The group comprised a good mixture of participants with diverse professional backgrounds.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

1.11.         

There were enough possibilities for interaction with the representatives of the host organisations.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.12.         

There was enough time allocated for discussion in the group.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.13.         

Cedefop website provided information that helped to prepare for the visit.

¨

x

¨

¨

¨

1.14.         

The organiser provided excellent support to the group.

x

¨

¨

¨

¨

  TOP

9. Acknowledgements

The participants of the study visit would like to express their gratitude to the hosts of the visit, Mrs Eugenia Tesoro and Mr Gianni Altavilla (the managing staff of the Network of European Active Citizens) and the Network staff (Ms Stefanie Møller from Denmark, Mr Panayiotis Angelides from Cyprus and Mr Finbarr O’Regan from Ireland) for the warm welcome given to all participants, an effective organization and interesting programme of the visit, as well as their high dedication to creating a truly United Europe through undertaking numerous projects aimed at fostering cooperation and building friendship between European people.
We would like to express special thanks to Mr Vincenzo Sabia, an English teacher in ‘Vittorio Scialoja’ Scuola Elementare and participant of a Comenius partnership coordinated by the author of this report, for his dedication to creating a great atmosphere among the group, showing the variety of the local culture and his assistance in the interpreting work during the visit. We wish to thank the principals of the local schools, Ms Maria Saletta Longobardo and Ms Lora Verrusio Grippa Scafati, for their hospitality and providing the group with the opportunity to experience the Italian education system first-hand.
Eventually, the author of the report would like to thank all the participants for creating such a lovely team of friends, open to break any ice and foster tolerance and mutual respect through shared work as well as social activities. Your outstanding performances approaching your national cultures will never be forgotten. I wish to meet you all again in the future.

Molte grazie! Thank you! Dziękuję!

  TOP

 

 


eXTReMe Tracker

Last updated: 2009-12-26
Copyright © 2008-2009-2010 by NEAC Network of European Active Citizens, NPO.
Legal Registation no. 1226/1T - REA/Chamber of Commerce no. NA-787591 - Fiscal Code 91009620633.
For problems or questions regarding this Web site contact webmaster@neac2.eu